My friend Stenzwi uses some strange interpretations of some seemingly harmless terms and phenomena. Not that I like him less for this quality of his but it’s hard to believe that somebody would actually scratch his head (with very few hair remaining on it) to come up with something that’ll add up to nothing at all. I’ll give you some examples to start with. Definition, for instance, is one of his forte. He has often told me that he plans to write a dictionary all by himself in the near future.
“And how do you plan to complete it?”
“Why would a dictionary be complete?”
“Aren’t they, generally?”
“Never. I’ll request you to become a member of the library of Stamphor and browse through some of the dictionaries there. You’ll see all of them are incomplete. Even if you find a term you’ve been looking for you’ll see that the definition given is insufficient.”
“I’m sure you’re planning to suffice them.”
“I’m going to start a revolution that would be carried forward through generations. A revolution to not just keep on adding on the number of words present in a dictionary but enrich the definition of those already present. I’ll call it “The Dictionary Revolution“.
Well, I had to go through a lengthy process of listening what his plans were and how he planned to execute them, followed by reading through a scrapbook he’s been collecting words. This is how one of the pages in his scrapbook looked -
|
|
“A dictionary is always infinite.” he told me at last. To which I replied – “Paper ain’t”.
And immediately, I felt sorry. Was I insulting him somehow? He was my friend after all.
“Paper is complicated,” he replied “I haven’t found a perfect definition for it yet.”
Recent Comments